The winners of Discover Magazine’s video competition.
The judge’s choice:
Viewers’ choice
by professorkim
The winners of Discover Magazine’s video competition.
The judge’s choice:
Viewers’ choice
by professorkim
Steve Outing asks a great question about the emergence of various “freemium” content models for news outlets:
“[W}hat is this premium content that newspaper companies can produce for the web (and mobile devices) that will get online users spending?”
Content that serves the needs of diverse communities might be the key to building successful “freemium” models.
Read the post, comments and Outing’s follow-up post for some interesting ideas. I think there are some niche possibilities for creating products tailored to the needs our increasingly diverse communities. My state, New Jersey, is both racially diverse and home to immigrants from more than 100 nations according to a 2009 study described in this article from the Newark Star-Ledger. I’m a middle-class, suburban-dwelling, physically-challenged, working African American mother who has lived and worked in the state for most of the last 35 years. Based on that experience and those of others I’ve met along the way, here are some of the kinds of information that people I know look for:
That’s just a couple of thoughts off the top of my head. What are your thoughts?
by professorkim
Please share your thoughts here or on my LinkedIn poll.
by professorkim
For decades, press freedom advocates have pushed for a national law to protect journalists’ rights to withhold confidential sources and data from government authorities. A bill wending its way through Congress, the Free Flow of Information Act of 2009, has come closer to passage than ever, with the blessing of the Obama administration, according to a postfrom the Reporters’ Committee on Freedom of the Press.
However, if the bill passes, it won’t apply to many of the people who are increasingly responsible for reporting the news. That’s because the bill defines a journalist as a person who gathers and disseminates information as a paid employee of a news organization. That means freelance bloggers and reporters will continue to operate in the legal limbo created by inconsistent state laws and judicial precedents.
For example, in a case reported by Damon Kiesow for Poynter.org, the New Hampshire Supreme court is considering whether a mortgage blogger who published a confidential document containing damaging information about a lender is entitled to the protections accorded journalists under that state’s shield law. The defendant describes himself as an online journalist: someone who, as his attorney put it operates with the intention to “gather, analyze and disseminate.”
That’s the standard advanced by former Society of Professional Journalists president Christine Tatum when I interviewed her in 2006 about the jailing of videoblogger Josh Wolf, who set a record for serving federal time for refusing to surrender outtakes from footage she shot of a 2005 demonstration. Ironically, Tatum and the other experts I interviewed for that story said Wolf’s case was a prime example of the need for a Federal shield law.
by professorkim